Construction of an elevator and an elevator shaft in the Malmi tn 5a building
TenderZenith matches this tender's eligibility criteria against your company profile to calculate a deterministic qualification score and identify potential disqualifiers.
A structured breakdown of scope, eligibility requirements, submission steps, and key conditions — extracted directly from the official notice.
Sign in to unlock Bid Fit & AI Opportunity Intelligence
TenderZenith calculates a personalized qualification score against your company profile and extracts structured intelligence from tender documents with your 7-Day Pro Trial (No Credit Card Required).
Description & Project Overview
The content of the works is the construction of an elevator and an elevator shaft that meets accessibility requirements and is intended for transporting people. The works also include changes to construction, technical systems and fire safety solutions related to the reconstruction of the building in accordance with the construction project and building permit. Lots note: The contracting authority decided not to divide the public procurement into parts, as this ensures faster, higher quality and more cost-effective achievement of the objectives of the procurement contract. Dividing the procurement into parts would make it more difficult and would significantly prolong the achievement of the goals and increase the total cost of the works. The subject of the procurement represents a complete and technically related solution, which is not practical to divide into parts. The technical interrelationship of the works and the need to ensure their complete and coordinated execution require the execution of the works by one contractor. In addition, the division of work between several contractors can create coordination risks, diffuse responsibility and prevent the achievement of a high-quality end result. The procurer has the right to check the absence of grounds for elimination and the qualification of only the successful tenderer (so-called reverse procedure). The procurer reserves the right to apply the provisions of § 52 (3) of the RHS. The contracting authority decided not to divide the public procurement into parts, as this ensures faster, higher quality and more cost-effective achievement of the objectives of the procurement contract. Dividing the procurement into parts would make it more difficult and would significantly prolong the achievement of the goals and increase the total cost of the works. The subject of the procurement represents a complete and technically related solution, which is not practical to divide into parts. The technical interrelationship of the works and the need to ensure their complete and coordinated execution require the execution of the works by one contractor. In addition, the division of work between several contractors can create coordination risks, diffuse responsibility and prevent the achievement of a high-quality end result. The procurer has the right to check the absence of grounds for elimination and the qualification of only the successful tenderer (so-called reverse procedure). The procurer reserves the right to apply the provisions of § 52 (3) of the RHS.